Adam Alter's Irresistible and the Immoderation Facet (N5)
Adam Alter's Irresistible makes an argument that should change how you judge your own screen habits: the pull is a feature in the product, not a flaw in you. Alter, a psychologist who studies behavioral addiction, shows that the apps and feeds we cannot put down were built, deliberately and expensively, to be that way. In an interview he is blunt about how effective that engineering is: "The thing about screens is that, once they contain irresistible content, they'll ensnare almost anyone." Almost anyone, not just the weak-willed. In the Big Five, the trait that decides how hard they pull on you specifically is one facet.
The pull is the Immoderation facet
The facet is Immoderation (N5), under Neuroticism, the difficulty resisting an urge once it is triggered. A high scorer feels the itch to check or scroll as urgent and hard to ignore; a low scorer can leave the notification alone. Alter's point is that the products are designed to defeat even a low-N5 person, largely by removing the natural moments where you would stop. As he explains, "Tech companies have done everything they can to eradicate these stopping cues." A book ends; a feed does not. High N5 makes you more susceptible, but the design is doing so much of the work that susceptibility is almost beside the point.
That framing matters because the usual story about phone use is a shaming one: you lack discipline, you should just put it down. Alter's research points somewhere more accurate and less cruel. When a product is engineered to have no natural endpoint and to reward you on an unpredictable schedule, staying on it is the expected outcome, not a personal defeat. For a high-N5 reader that is genuinely freeing, because it moves the fix from grinding willpower against the urge to changing the environment that keeps firing it: adding back the stopping cues the designers stripped out, with timers and the phone left in another room.
We break the facet down on its own in Immoderation (N5), and the thrill-seeking cousin in sensation-seeking through OCEAN. Irresistible is not anti-technology, and it does not pretend individual habits do not matter. Its useful correction is where it puts the blame: if you keep losing an hour you meant to spend elsewhere, the first move is to notice that you are up against a machine built by people whose job was to keep you there, not to hate your own weakness. Then you can stop fighting the urge fairly and start rigging the game back.
Read the book: Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked by Adam Alter.
See Where You Fall
Where do you actually fall? The 30-facet OCEAN personality test takes about 15 minutes and scores all five domains and the facets underneath them. Take the test
Research Citations
Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. Penguin Press.
Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90-99.
Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.