Who Leads
Where Assertiveness and Activity Level concentrate, so you can see who is really steering the group and who is going along with it.
Every recurring group settles into a shape. One person takes over the planning, one quietly checks out, one keeps the peace, one derails the session for the fun of it. Run the assessment on your group and you get a map of the table: who leads, who gets talked over, who needs drawing out, and where the friction lives.
"Three of your five members score below the 15th percentile on Assertiveness and one sits at the 92nd. In practice the loud one is making the group's decisions while the other four go along and quietly resent it. Nobody planned this; the profiles just made it inevitable."
"Two members are both high on Excitement Seeking (85 and 78) and both low on Cautiousness. When they agree, the group commits to a plan nobody thought through. The steady member at Cautiousness 80 is the brake, and the group tends to talk over the brake."
"Your quietest member scores in the 90s on Openness and Intellect but at the 20th on Assertiveness. The best ideas at the table are coming from the person least likely to fight to be heard. Draw them out on purpose and the group gets sharper."
Send everyone the link. Each member completes the IPIP-NEO-120 on their own in about 15 minutes. It measures five core dimensions across 30 sub-facets.
The report lines up everyone's profiles and shows where the group aligns, where it splits, and which trait combinations predict who leads, who follows, and who clashes.
Get a group report that names the roles nobody assigned: the planner, the wildcard, the peacemaker, the one running the show, and the one worth pulling into the conversation.
Missing a player?
Estimate an absent member's personality from a short description and still include them in the map of the group. Less precise than a real result, but it keeps the picture of the table complete.
Estimate their personalityWhere Assertiveness and Activity Level concentrate, so you can see who is really steering the group and who is going along with it.
The specific trait gaps most likely to cause a blow-up at the table, from pace to risk tolerance to how the group handles a plan falling apart.
Members whose ideas outrun their willingness to push for them, and who the group tends to talk over without meaning to.
How the group tends to make choices, whether it charges ahead on impulse or stalls waiting for consensus that never quite arrives.
Where Extraversion sits across the group, which shapes how long sessions run and who is fried by the end of them.
The pairings that make the group better than the sum of its members, and how to lean on them when a session goes sideways.
If you run the group, whether that means dungeon master, club organizer, or the person who always ends up booking the venue, you already carry a mental model of everyone at the table. You know who to hand the plan to and who to keep an eye on. A profile turns that instinct into something you can point at.
It answers the questions that decide whether a session is fun or a slog. Who dominates when you let the group self-organize. Who disappears unless you pull them in by name. Which two members should not be handed the same task, and which pairing quietly carries the night. For a game master, it is party composition for the real people, not the characters.
The 30-facet OCEAN personality test is free for the domain scores, so the whole group can take it before your next session at no cost. The group report is where the map of the table lives, and it tends to start more conversations than it settles.
The group report works for a small crew, roughly two to five people, which fits most game tables, book clubs, and friend groups. Each member takes the assessment on their own and the report maps how the personalities in the room interact.
Each member takes the 15-minute test and gets their own five domain scores for free. To build the group report you collect everyone's results, and one person unlocks the report for the table.
You can estimate an absent member's profile from a short description and still include them in the group map. It is less precise than a real result, but it keeps the picture of the table complete.
Both work. The instrument is the real IPIP-NEO-120 with decades of research behind it, so the profiles are accurate. How seriously you take the results at the table is up to your group.