Chris Jones's The Eye Test (O5, O1)
Chris Jones, a longtime magazine writer, built The Eye Test around a worry that data has quietly crowded out human judgment in field after field, from sports to medicine to art. His counterargument is personal, on its quotes page: "I turn to people for joy and its uniquely human antecedents, like inspiration and desire. I will never tire of hearing talented makers talking about their work. It's like a medicine that might be prescribed to you when you're feeling hopeless." That hunger to think with human insight rather than lean only on the numbers is, in the Big Five, two facets.
Trusting human insight over the numbers is Intellect
That facet is Intellect (O5), under Openness, your appetite for ideas, for thinking a problem through, and for the kind of understanding that comes from judgment rather than a formula. Jones is writing for high O5: the reader who wants to reason about a thing, not just measure it. A high scorer is pulled toward the hard, interesting question and trusts a trained eye to see what data misses. A lower scorer prefers the clear answer a number gives and feels safer with the metric than with a hunch.
The argument that gives the book its spine is that analytics and judgment are partners rather than rivals, and that dropping the human half is its own kind of error. Jones makes the case that the trained eye, the expert hunch, and the creative leap are real forms of knowing that data alone cannot replace, which sits close to the inventive inner world that generates ideas in the first place. For a lower-O5 reader the usable move is to sit with one open question before reaching for a metric to settle it. The numbers are not going away. Jones's point is that the human eye still sees things the spreadsheet never will.
The case for human creativity is Imagination
The book's subtitle makes its second facet plain, Imagination (O1), under Openness, the inventive, original spark that produces something a formula never would. Jones is defending human creativity against a world that wants to reduce everything to a metric, and creativity is the faculty he is protecting. A high scorer generates ideas and images readily and trusts that inventive leap. A lower scorer works more from the given and the measured, and reads Jones as a case for a capacity they use less often.
Read both your O5 and your O1 to know how The Eye Test lands. If your intellect runs high, Jones defends the trained human judgment you already prize. If your imagination runs high, the book is a case for the creative leap the spreadsheet cannot make. Human insight is both judgment and invention. Jones argues neither should be handed to the data alone.
Read the book: The Eye Test: A Case for Human Creativity in the Age of Analytics by Chris Jones.
See Where You Fall
Where do you actually fall? The 30-facet OCEAN personality test takes about 15 minutes and scores all five domains and the facets underneath them. Take the test
Research Citations
Jones, C. (2022). The eye test: A case for human creativity in the age of analytics. Twelve.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880-896.
Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.